Stokholmā un Parīzē ir rajoni, uz kuriem tu varētu patiesības vārdā aiziet pārbaudīt. Gan jau arī citās Eiropas lielajās pilsētās arī.

It's not mentioned anywhere that non-Muslims must be killed. There are verses discussing wars and conflicts, but verses that allegedly incite hatred against non-Muslims exist only in the minds of ill-informed and bigoted individuals.   The following verse is usually taken out of context by some people to prove that Islam is a “violent cult" that seeks to convert everyone using force.   But once the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them, capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them on every way. But if they repent, perform prayers, and pay alms-tax, then set them free. Indeed, Allah is the All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.   9:5   They take this single text and try to present it as evidence that the Qur'an is a violent book that orders the killing of non-Muslims. But they usually omit mentioning the verse that precedes it and the one that follows. Why? Because those verses debunk their fallacies.   As for the polytheists who have honoured every term of their treaty with you and have not supported an enemy against you, honour your treaty with them until the end of it's term. Surely Allah loves those who are mindful of him.   9:4   And if anyone from the polytheists asks for your protection, grant it to them so they may hear the word of Allah, then escort them to a place of safety, for they are people who have no knowledge.   9:6   See? Those three verses clearly say that only the polytheists who attack Muslims without provocation are to be fought, but those who cherry pick what they want wouldn't know that.   Now, why were such verses revealed in the first place? In 628, Muslims of Medina and the Meccan polytheists signed a 10 year-old truce called the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.   Two years later, the Meccans along with Banu Bakr broke the truce and massacred Banu Khuza'ah, a tribe aligned with Medina. This incident took place during the Muslim holy months, when fighting is forbidden. As a result, a verse that allowed Muslims to exact vengeance, after the holy months, was revealed.   It's also mentioned elsewhere that Muslims are forbidden from killing non-combatants.   Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loves not transgressors.   2:190   Now, are Muslims ordered to kill non-Muslims? Only enemy combatants who attack Muslims without provocation.   In order to understand the Qur'an, one must read it all without cherry picking, especially when it comes to verses about warfare. Reading about early Islamic history would also help in understanding why such verses were originally revealed.   Edit:   It seems that there's a contagious disease spreading here that results in people becoming somewhat of illiterates. I never said the Qur'an orders Muslims to kill non-Muslims rather that it's mentioned to fight enemy combatants who break the treaties. I also said that it's explicitly mentioned not to kill civilians.   Read the god damn answer before you demonstrate your ignorance in the comment section.   https://www.quora.com/Where-if-anywhere-in-the-Quran-does-it-say-that-non-believers-must-be-killed-and-in-what-context/answer/Arthur-Dean-35

Reģionālās radiostacijas uz *septiņiem rokas pirkstiem saskaitāmas. Lielie spēlētāji viņas pamazām, pamazām pārpērk. *Kurzemes Radio, Latgales Radio, Divu Krastu Radio, Radio Ef-Ei, Radio Rēzekne, Radio 1, Alise+, Radio 9 no Jūrmalas vairs neskaitās, tā pieder Skonto grupai.

Mautkāda aizdoma ka par tiem otrajiem ir pilnīgs fufels un propoganda.

Nu šitiem ir šortlists vismaz, ko aktīvi pilda. Tiem otriem visi vienā katlā. Arī aktīvi pilda.

Vispār jau arī Torā ir rakstīts, ka ir jāiznīcina apkārtējās nācijas/tautas. Nevienā citā "grāmatā" nekā tāda nav.   The Tanakh (Jewish Bible) contains commandments that prescribe the extermination of specific nations, particularly the seven Canaanite nations, and recounts wars where entire groups were annihilated.  The land of Canaan roughly corresponds to the Levant region, encompassing parts of modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria.    No turienes arī tā apsēstībā ka visi citi ir jāpiebeidz par katru cenu.    

Viņiem pasaku grāmatā tā ierakstīts.

Apturot USAID, Āfrikā atsāk straujāk izplatīties infekcijas slimības, kuras bija izskaustas vai kuru izplatība bija būtiski samazināta, to skaitā tādas, kuras izraisa aklumu, arī visādi zarnu parazīti utt., protams arī vecais labais hiv. Uz labo pusi, kā tad.   https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/apr/09/despair-as-cuts-halt-progress-on-neglected-tropical-diseases-usaid   The spending of about $112m (£87m) a year was almost “a rounding error” compared with USAID’s bigger programmes tackling diseases like HIV and malaria, she says.   “For such a little amount, we’ve been able to reach so many people and we could finally get rid of some of these diseases that have been around since for ever. I mean, some of them were referenced in the Bible,” she says. “To have that all put at risk is really devastating. Just in our programme alone, there’s over 100 million people that are now going to be at risk.”   https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/hivaids/usaid-defunding-could-lead-14-million-deaths-worldwide-infectious-diseases-2030   Higher USAID funding levels—mainly for LMICs in Africa—were tied to a 15% reduction in age-standardized, all-cause deaths (risk ratio [RR], 0.85) and a 32% cut in deaths among children younger than 5 years (RR, 0.68). This indicates that USAID financing prevented 91.8 million all-age deaths, including 30.4 million preschool children, from 2001 to 2021, the authors said.   The financial support was linked to a 65% reduction in deaths from HIV/AIDS (representing 25.5 million deaths) and reductions of 51% and 50% from malaria (8.0 million) and neglected tropical diseases (8.9 million), respectively.   Significant declines were also seen in deaths from tuberculosis, malnutrition, diarrheal illnesses, lower respiratory-tract infections, and maternal and perinatal conditions. Models predicted that continued USAID funding cuts could lead to more than 14.1 million excess all-age deaths, including 4.5 million in children younger than age 5, by 2030.

vini pat savejos sauc par parazitiem  

Kāpēc tu tā domā?

Nu pēc Glastenburijas jau ātri vien sarakstu pagarināja 😂 Pārāk 'plāna āda' tur Amerikā, lai gan esot tak 'brīvā runa' tur.   https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/state-department-bans-visas-english-punk-duo-bob-vylan-glastonbury-per-rcna215996

viens no otra macas taspats ar ASV, pamegini kadu cucibu pakritizet, busi terroristu saraksta nr.1. ta ka tas nosedeja kkada vesnieciba paris desmit gadus. bet to armijas personalu kuri slakteja civilos "just for fun" pec gada atbrivoja kad mediji apklusa

Ļoti iespējams. Ir gan nianse - arābiem, ja neesi arābs, draugs nebūsi nekad. 

tiem zeonistiem vari but draugs vai ienainieks. varu deret ka dzersi ar tadu kafiju un kucinas bet kad vienu reizi nejaushi paskatisies (dies ja pasveicinasi) kadu paletainieti tad naksies emigret uz citu valsti droshiba un mainit identitati lai mosad neatrod

Kāds dzīvo 80tos, kāds 90os. Oh, well. Es piemestu vēl 2000os un 2010os. Un baudam!  

0:17 ļoti skaistas meitenes

Pirmie, ko varu iedomāties no zināmajiem, Pugačova ar savu Galkinu un komiķis Hazanovs.

Esi atpalicis par gadiņiem etaki 5-10. Nupat jau pasaule velk uz pretējo pusi. Jautājums, vai arī tā ir tā pasaule, uz kuru lauzies. Tajā pasaulē, uz kuru iet tagad, negaida tos, kas kaut kur laužas...   lai nav beztēma, šorīt pa radio skanēja, šodienai piemērota:  sweat, baby, sweat!

Vecie Jaunā viļņa dinozauri arī atmodušies! Vispār šī absolūti jautrā dziesma mani pavilka uz skumjām pārdomām. Tas, par ko viņi dzied, - tā ir tā pasaule, kurā mēs gribējām nokļūt, kad lauzāmies ārā no dzelzs priekškara. Bet tā arī nenokļuvām, jo šīs pasaules vairs nav. Tās vietā - progresīvi liberālā miskaste.